South Carolina UCCJEA
S.C. Code Ann. §
63-15-300 et. seq.
This document is current through Chs. 1-86, 88-96 of the 2017 session.
§ 63-15-300. Citation.
This article may be
cited as the “Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act”.
§ 63-15-302. Definitions.
As used in this article:
(1) “Abandoned”
means left without provision for reasonable and necessary care or supervision.
(2) “Child”
means an individual who has not attained eighteen years of age.
(3) “Child
custody determination” means a judgment, decree, or other order of a court
providing for the legal custody, physical custody, or visitation with respect to
a child. The term includes a permanent, temporary, initial, and modification
order. The term does not include an order relating to child support or other
monetary obligation of an individual.
(4) “Child
custody proceeding” means a proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody,
or visitation with respect to a child is an issue. The term includes a
proceeding for divorce, separation, neglect, abuse, dependency, guardianship,
paternity, termination of parental rights, and protection from domestic
violence, in which the issue may appear. The term does not include a proceeding
involving juvenile delinquency, contractual emancipation, or enforcement under
Subarticle 3.
(5) “Commencement”
means the filing of the first pleading in a proceeding.
(6) “Court”
means an entity authorized under the law of a state to establish, enforce, or
modify a child custody determination.
(7) “Home
state” means the state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting
as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the
commencement of a child custody proceeding. In the case of a child less than six
months of age, the term means the state in which the child lived from birth with
any of the persons mentioned. A period of temporary absence of any of the
mentioned persons is part of the period.
(8) “Initial
determination” means the first child custody determination concerning a
particular child.
(9) “Issuing
court” means the court that makes a child custody determination for which
enforcement is sought under this article.
(10)
“Issuing state” means the state in
which a child custody determination is made.
(11)
“Modification” means a child custody
determination that changes, replaces, supersedes, or is otherwise made after a
previous determination concerning the same child, whether or not it is made by
the court that made the previous determination.
(12)
“Person” means an individual,
corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability
company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision,
governmental agency or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal
or commercial entity.
(13)
“Person acting as a parent” means a
person, other than a parent, who:
(a)
has physical
custody of the child or has had physical custody for a period of six consecutive
months, including any temporary absence, within one year immediately before the
commencement of a child custody proceeding; and
(b)
has been awarded
legal custody by a court or claims a right to legal custody under the law of
this State.
(14)
“Physical custody” means the physical
care and supervision of a child.
(15)
“State” means a state of the United
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands,
or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.
(16)
“Tribe” means an Indian tribe or
band, or Alaskan native village, which is recognized by federal law or formally
acknowledged by a state.
(17)
“Warrant” means an order issued by a
court authorizing law enforcement officers to take physical custody of a child.
§
63-15-304. Exemption proceedings.
This article does
not govern an adoption proceeding or a proceeding pertaining to the
authorization of emergency medical care for a child.
§ 63-15-306. Indian
children proceedings exempt.
(A)
A child custody
proceeding that pertains to an Indian child as defined in the Indian Child
Welfare Act,
25 USC Section 1901
et seq., is not subject to this article to the extent that it is governed by the
Indian Child Welfare Act.
(B)
A court of this State shall treat a
tribe as if it were a state of the United States for the purpose of applying
Subarticles 1 and 2.
(C)
A child custody determination made by
a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the
jurisdictional standards of this article must be recognized and enforced under
Subarticle 3.
§ 63-15-308. Recognition of
foreign country custody.
(A)
A court of this
State shall treat a foreign country as if it were a state of the United States
for the purpose of applying Subarticles 1 and 2.
(B)
Except as otherwise provided in
subsection (C), a child custody determination made in a foreign country under
factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional
standards of this article must be recognized and enforced under Subarticle 3.
(C)
A court of this State need not apply
this article if the child custody law of a foreign country violates fundamental
principles of human rights.
§
63-15-310. Determinations binding.
A child custody
determination made by a court of this State that had jurisdiction under this
article binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of
this State or notified in accordance with
Section 63-15-314 or who have submitted to the jurisdiction
of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard. As to those
persons, the determination is conclusive as to all decided issues of law and
fact except to the extent the determination is modified.
§
63-15-312. Jurisdiction issues take priority.
If a question of
existence or exercise of jurisdiction under this article is raised in a child
custody proceeding, the question, upon request of a party, must be given
priority on the calendar and handled expeditiously.
§ 63-15-314. Notice; proof
of service; submission to jurisdiction.
(A)
Notice required for
the exercise of jurisdiction when a person is outside this State may be given in
a manner prescribed by the law of this State for service of process or by the
law of the state in which the service is made. Notice must be given in a manner
reasonably calculated to give actual notice but may be by publication if other
means are not effective.
(B)
Proof of service may be made in the
manner prescribed by the law of this State or by the law of the state in which
the service is made.
(C)
Notice is not required for the
exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person who submits to the
jurisdiction of the court.
§ 63-15-316. Immunity.
(A)
A party to a child
custody proceeding, including a modification proceeding, or a petitioner or
respondent in a proceeding to enforce or register a child custody determination,
is not subject to personal jurisdiction in this State for another proceeding or
purpose solely by reason of having participated, or of having been physically
present for the purpose of participating, in the proceeding.
(B)
A person who is subject to personal
jurisdiction in this State on a basis other than physical presence is not immune
from service of process in this State. A party present in this State who is
subject to the jurisdiction of another state is not immune from service of
process allowable under the laws of that state.
(C)
The immunity granted by subsection
(A) does not extend to civil litigation based on acts unrelated to the
participation in a proceeding under this act committed by an individual while
present in this State.
§ 63-15-318. Communication
with out-of-state courts.
(A)
A court of this
State may communicate with a court in another state concerning a proceeding
arising under this article.
(B)
The court may allow the parties to
participate in the communication. If the parties are not able to participate in
the communication, they must be given the opportunity to present facts and legal
arguments before a decision on jurisdiction is made.
(C)
Communication between courts on
schedules, calendars, court records, and similar matters may occur without
informing the parties. A record need not be made of the communication.
(D)
Except as otherwise provided in
subsection (C), a record must be made of a communication under this section. The
parties must be informed promptly of the communication and granted access to the
record.
(E)
For the purposes of this section,
“record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is
stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
§ 63-15-320. Testimony of
out-of-state witnesses.
(A)
In addition to
other procedures available to a party, a party to a child custody proceeding may
offer testimony of witnesses who are located in another state, including
testimony of the parties and the child, by deposition or other means allowable
in this State for testimony taken in another state. The court on its own motion
may order that the testimony of a person be taken in another state and may
prescribe the manner in which and the terms upon which the testimony is taken.
(B)
A court of this State may permit an
individual residing in another state to be deposed or to testify by telephone,
audiovisual means, or other electronic means before a designated court or at
another location in that state. A court of this State shall cooperate with
courts of other states in designating an appropriate location for the deposition
or testimony.
(C)
Documentary evidence transmitted from
another state to a court of this State by technological means that do not
produce an original writing may not be excluded from evidence on an objection
based on the means of transmission.
§ 63-15-322. Request for
hearing in another state; preservation of records.
(A)
A court of this
State may request the appropriate court of another state to:
(1)
hold an evidentiary
hearing;
(2)
order a person to
produce or give evidence pursuant to procedures of that state;
(3)
order that an
evaluation be made with respect to the custody of a child involved in a pending
proceeding;
(4)
forward to the
court of this State a certified copy of the transcript of the record of the
hearing, the evidence otherwise presented, and any evaluation prepared in
compliance with the request; and
(5)
order a party to a
child custody proceeding or any person having physical custody of the child to
appear in the proceeding with or without the child.
(B)
Upon request of a court of another
state, a court of this State may hold a hearing or enter an order described in
subsection (A).
(C)
Travel and other necessary and
reasonable expenses incurred under subsections (A) and (B) may be assessed
against the parties according to the law of this State.
(D)
A court of this State shall preserve
the pleadings, orders, decrees, records of hearings, evaluations, and other
pertinent records with respect to a child custody proceeding until the child
attains eighteen years of age. Upon appropriate request by a court or law
enforcement official of another state, the court shall forward a certified copy
of those records.
§ 63-15-330. Basis for
jurisdiction.
(A)
Except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-336,
a court of this State has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody
determination only if:
(1)
this State is the
home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or
was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the
proceeding and the child is absent from this State, but a parent or person
acting as a parent continues to live in this State;
(2)
a court of another
state does not have jurisdiction under item (1), or a court of the home state of
the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this State is
the more appropriate forum under
Section 63-15-342
or
63-15-344,
and:
(a)
the child and the
child’s parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a
parent, have a significant connection with this State other than mere physical
presence; and
(b)
substantial
evidence is available in this State concerning the child’s care, protection,
training, and personal relationships;
(3)
all courts, having
jurisdiction under item (1) or (2), have declined to exercise jurisdiction on
the ground that a court of this State is the more appropriate forum to determine
the custody of the child under
Section 63-15-342
or
63-15-344;
or
(4)
no court of any
other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in item (1),
(2), or (3).
(B)
Subsection (A) is the exclusive
jurisdictional basis for making a child custody determination by a court of this
State.
(C)
Physical presence of, or personal
jurisdiction over, a party or a child is not necessary or sufficient to make a
child custody determination.
§ 63-15-332. Exclusive,
continuing jurisdiction.
(A)
Except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-336,
a court of this State which has made a child custody determination consistent
with
Section 63-15-330
or
63-15-334
has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over the determination until:
(1)
a court of this
State determines that neither the child, the child’s parents, and any person
acting as a parent do not have a significant connection with this State and that
substantial evidence is no longer available in this State concerning the child’s
care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or
(2)
a court of this
State or a court of another state determines that the child, the child’s
parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in this
State.
(B)
A court of this State which has made
a child custody determination and does not have exclusive, continuing
jurisdiction under this section may modify that determination only if it has
jurisdiction to make an initial determination under
Section 63-15-330.
§ 63-15-334. Custody
modification by another state.
Except as otherwise provided in
Section 63-15-336,
a court of this State may not modify a child custody determination made by a
court of another state unless a court of this State has jurisdiction to make an
initial determination under
Section 63-15-330(A)(1)
or (2) and:
(1)
the court of the
other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under
Section 63-15-332
or that a court of this State would be a more convenient forum under
Section 63-15-342;
or
(2)
a court of this
State or a court of the other state determines that the child, the child’s
parents, and any person acting as a parent do not presently reside in the other
state.
§ 63-15-336. Temporary
jurisdiction.
(A)
A court of this
State has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State
and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect
the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected
to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse.
(B)
If there is no previous child custody
determination that is entitled to be enforced under this article and a child
custody proceeding has not been commenced in a court of a state having
jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334,
a child custody determination made under this section remains in effect until an
order is obtained from a court of a state having jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334.
If a child custody proceeding has not been or is not commenced in a court of a
state having jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334,
a child custody determination made under this section becomes a final
determination, if it so provides and this State becomes the home state of the
child.
(C)
If there is a previous child custody
determination that is entitled to be enforced under this article, or a child
custody proceeding has been commenced in a court of a state having jurisdiction
under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334,
any order issued by a court of this State under this section must specify in the
order a period that the court considers adequate to allow the person seeking an
order to obtain an order from the state having jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334.
The order issued in this State remains in effect until an order is obtained from
the other state within the period specified or the period expires.
(D)
A court of this State which has been
asked to make a child custody determination under this section, upon being
informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a child
custody determination has been made by, a court of a state having jurisdiction
under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334,
shall immediately communicate with the other court. A court of this State, which
is exercising jurisdiction pursuant to
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334,
upon being informed that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in, or a
child custody determination has been made by a court of another state under a
statute similar to this section, shall immediately communicate with the court of
that state to resolve the emergency, protect the safety of the parties and the
child, and determine a period for the duration of the temporary order.
§ 63-15-338. Notice;
obligation to join party and right to intervene.
(A)
Before a child
custody determination is made under this article, notice and an opportunity to
be heard in accordance with the standards of
Section 63-15-314
must be given to all persons entitled to notice under the law of this State as
in child custody proceedings between residents of this State, any parent whose
parental rights have not been previously terminated, and any person having
physical custody of the child.
(B)
This article does not govern the
enforceability of a child custody determination made without notice or an
opportunity to be heard.
(C)
The obligation to join a party and
the right to intervene as a party in a child custody proceeding under this
article are governed by the law of this State as in child custody proceedings
between residents of this State.
§ 63-15-340. Stays of other
proceedings.
(A)
Except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-336,
a court of this State may not exercise its jurisdiction under this subarticle
if, at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concerning
the custody of the child has been commenced in a court of another state having
jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this article, unless the
proceeding has been terminated or is stayed by the court of the other state
because a court of this State is a more convenient forum under
Section 63-15-342.
(B)
Except as otherwise provided in
Section 63-15-336,
a court of this State, before hearing a child custody proceeding, shall examine
the court documents and other information supplied by the parties pursuant to
Section 63-15-346.
If the court determines that a child custody proceeding has been commenced in a
court in another state having jurisdiction substantially in accordance with this
article, the court of this State shall stay its proceeding and communicate with
the court of the other state. If the court of the state having jurisdiction
substantially in accordance with this article does not determine that the court
of this State is a more appropriate forum, the court of this State shall dismiss
the proceeding.
(C)
In a proceeding to modify a child
custody determination, a court of this State shall determine whether a
proceeding to enforce the determination has been commenced in another state. If
a proceeding to enforce a child custody determination has been commenced in
another state, the court may:
(1)
stay the proceeding
for modification pending the entry of an order of a court of the other state
enforcing, staying, denying, or dismissing the proceeding for enforcement;
(2)
enjoin the parties
from continuing with the proceeding for enforcement; or
(3)
proceed with the
modification under conditions it considers appropriate.
§ 63-15-342. Inconvenient
forum.
(A)
A court of this
State, which has jurisdiction under this article to make a child custody
determination, may decline to exercise its jurisdiction at any time if it
determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a
court of another state is a more appropriate forum. The issue of inconvenient
forum may be raised upon motion of a party, the court’s own motion, or request
of another court.
(B)
Before determining whether it is an
inconvenient forum, a court of this State shall consider whether it is
appropriate for a court of another state to exercise jurisdiction. For this
purpose, the court shall allow the parties to submit information and shall
consider all relevant factors, including:
(1)
whether domestic
violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state
could best protect the parties and the child;
(2)
the length of time
the child has resided outside this State;
(3)
the distance
between the court in this State and the court in the state that would assume
jurisdiction;
(4)
the relative
financial circumstances of the parties;
(5)
any agreement of
the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction;
(6)
the nature and
location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including
testimony of the child;
(7)
the ability of the
court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures
necessary to present the evidence; and
(8)
the familiarity of
the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.
(C)
If a court of this State determines
that it is an inconvenient forum and that a court of another state is a more
appropriate forum, it shall stay the proceedings upon condition that a child
custody proceeding be promptly commenced in another designated state and may
impose any other condition the court considers just and proper.
(D)
A court of this State may decline to
exercise its jurisdiction under this article if a child custody determination is
incidental to an action for divorce or another proceeding while still retaining
jurisdiction over the divorce or other proceeding.
§ 63-15-344. Unjustifiable
jurisdiction.
(A)
Except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-336
or by other law of this State, if a court of this State has jurisdiction under
this article because a person seeking to invoke its jurisdiction has engaged in
unjustifiable conduct, the court shall decline to exercise its jurisdiction
unless:
(1)
the parents and all
persons acting as parents have acquiesced in the exercise of jurisdiction;
(2)
a court of the
state otherwise having jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334
determines that this State is a more appropriate forum under
Section 63-15-342;
or
(3)
no court of any
other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334.
(B)
If a court of this State declines to
exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (A), it may fashion an
appropriate remedy to ensure the safety of the child and prevent a repetition of
the unjustifiable conduct, including staying the proceeding until a child
custody proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction under
Sections 63-15-330
through
63-15-334.
(C)
If a court dismisses a petition or
stays a proceeding because it declines to exercise its jurisdiction pursuant to
subsection (A), it shall assess against the party seeking to invoke its
jurisdiction necessary and reasonable expenses including costs, communication
expenses, attorney’s fees, investigative fees, expenses for witnesses, travel
expenses, and childcare during the course of the proceedings, unless the party
from whom fees are sought establishes that the assessment would be clearly
inappropriate. The court may not assess fees, costs, or expenses against this
State unless authorized by law other than this article.
§ 63-15-346. Information
regarding other proceedings.
(A)
Subject to local
law providing for the confidentiality of procedures, addresses, and other
identifying information, in a child custody proceeding, each party, in its first
pleading or in an attached affidavit, shall give information, if reasonably
ascertainable, under oath as to the child’s present address or whereabouts, the
places where the child has lived during the last five years, and the names and
present addresses of the persons with whom the child has lived during that
period. The pleading or affidavit must state whether the party:
(1)
has participated,
as a party or witness or in any other capacity, in any other proceeding
concerning the custody of or visitation with the child and, if so, identify the
court, the case number, and the date of the child custody determination, if any;
(2)
knows of any
proceeding that could affect the current proceeding, including proceedings for
enforcement and proceedings relating to domestic violence, protective orders,
termination of parental rights, and adoptions and, if so, identify the court,
the case number, and the nature of the proceeding; and
(3)
knows the names and
addresses of any person not a party to the proceeding who has physical custody
of the child or claims rights of legal custody or physical custody of, or
visitation with, the child and, if so, the names and addresses of those persons.
(B)
If the information required by
subsection (A) is not furnished, the court, upon motion of a party or its own
motion, may stay the proceeding until the information is furnished.
(C)
If the declaration as to any of the
items described in subsection (A)(1) through (3) is in the affirmative, the
declarant shall give additional information under oath as required by the court.
The court may examine the parties under oath as to details of the information
furnished and other matters pertinent to the court’s jurisdiction and the
disposition of the case.
(D)
Each party has a continuing duty to
inform the court of any proceeding in this State or any other state that could
affect the current proceeding.
(E)
If a party alleges in an affidavit or
a pleading under oath that the health, safety, or liberty of a party or child
would be jeopardized by disclosure of identifying information, the information
must be sealed and may not be disclosed to the other party or the public unless
the court orders the disclosure to be made after a hearing in which the court
takes into consideration the health, safety, or liberty of the party or child
and determines that the disclosure is in the interest of justice.
§ 63-15-348. Persons
requested to appear.
(A)
In a child custody
proceeding in this State, the court may order a party to the proceeding who is
in this State to appear before the court in person with or without the child.
The court may order any person who is in this State and who has physical custody
or control of the child to appear in person with the child.
(B)
If a party to a child custody
proceeding whose presence is desired by the court is outside this State, the
court may order that a notice given pursuant to
Section 63-15-314
includes a statement directing the party to appear in person with or without the
child and informing the party that failure to appear may result in a decision
adverse to the party.
(C)
The court may enter any orders
necessary to ensure the safety of the child and of any person ordered to appear
under this section.
(D)
If a party to a child custody
proceeding who is outside of this State is directed to appear under subsection
(B) or desires to appear personally before the court with or without the child,
the court may require another party to pay reasonable and necessary travel and
other expenses of the party so appearing and of the child.
§ 63-15-350. Definitions.
As used in this subarticle:
(1)
“Petitioner” means
a person who seeks enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or enforcement
of a child custody determination.
(2)
“Respondent” means
a person against whom a proceeding has been commenced for enforcement of an
order for return of a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determination.
§
63-15-352. Enforcement under Hague Convention.
Under this
subarticle a court of this State may enforce an order for the return of the
child made under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International
Child Abduction as if it were a child custody determination.
§ 63-15-354. Enforcing
other states’ orders.
(A)
A court of this
State shall recognize and enforce a child custody determination of a court of
another state if the latter court exercised jurisdiction in substantial
conformity with this article or the determination was made under factual
circumstances meeting the jurisdictional standards of this article and the
determination has not been modified in accordance with this article.
(B)
A court of this State may utilize any
remedy available under other law of this State to enforce a child custody
determination made by a court of another state. The remedies provided in this
subarticle are cumulative and do not affect the availability of other remedies
to enforce a child custody determination.
§ 63-15-356. Visitation.
(A)
A court of this
State which does not have jurisdiction to modify a child custody determination,
may issue a temporary order enforcing:
(1)
a visitation
schedule made by a court of another state; or
(2)
the visitation
provisions of a child custody determination of another state that does not
provide for a specific visitation schedule.
(B)
If a court of this State makes an
order under subsection (A)(2), it shall specify in the order a period that it
considers adequate to allow the petitioner to obtain an order from a court
having jurisdiction under the criteria specified in Subarticle 2. The order
remains in effect until an order is obtained from the other court or the period
expires.
§ 63-15-358. Registration
of out-of-state custody order.
(A)
A child custody
determination issued by a court of another state may be registered in this
State, with or without a simultaneous request for enforcement, by sending to the
appropriate court in this State:
(1)
a letter or other
document requesting registration;
(2)
two copies,
including one certified copy, of the determination sought to be registered, and
a statement under penalty of perjury that to the best of the knowledge and
belief of the person seeking registration the order has not been modified; and
(3)
except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-346,
the name and address of the person seeking registration and any parent or person
acting as a parent who has been awarded custody or visitation in the child
custody determination sought to be registered.
(B)
On receipt of the documents required
by subsection (A), the registering court shall:
(1)
cause the
determination to be filed as a foreign judgment, together with one copy of any
accompanying documents and information, regardless of their form; and
(2)
serve notice upon
the persons named pursuant to subsection (A)(3) and provide them with an
opportunity to contest the registration in accordance with this section.
(C)
The notice required by subsection
(B)(2) must state that:
(1)
a registered
determination is enforceable as of the date of the registration in the same
manner as a determination issued by a court of this State;
(2)
a hearing to
contest the validity of the registered determination must be requested within
twenty days after service of notice; and
(3)
failure to contest
the registration will result in confirmation of the child custody determination
and preclude further contest of that determination with respect to any matter
that could have been asserted.
(D)
A person seeking to contest the
validity of a registered order must request a hearing within twenty days after
service of the notice. At that hearing, the court shall confirm the registered
order unless the person contesting registration establishes that:
(1)
the issuing court
did not have jurisdiction under Subarticle 2;
(2)
the child custody
determination sought to be registered has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a
court having jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2; or
(3)
the person
contesting registration was entitled to notice, but notice was not given in
accordance with the standards of
Section 63-15-314,
in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which registration
is sought.
(E)
If a timely request for a hearing to
contest the validity of the registration is not made, the registration is
confirmed as a matter of law and the person requesting registration and all
persons served must be notified of the confirmation.
(F)
Confirmation of a registered order,
whether by operation of law or after notice and hearing, precludes further
contest of the order with respect to any matter that could have been asserted at
the time of registration.
§ 63-15-360. Enforcement of
registered order.
(A)
A court of this
State may grant any relief normally available under the law of this State to
enforce a registered child custody determination made by a court of another
state.
(B)
A court of this State shall recognize
and enforce, but may not modify, except in accordance with Subarticle 2, a
registered child custody determination of a court of another state.
§
63-15-362. Modification pending out-of-state.
If a proceeding for
enforcement under this subarticle is commenced in a court of this State and the
court determines that a proceeding to modify the determination is pending in a
court of another state having jurisdiction to modify the determination under
Subarticle 2, the enforcing court shall immediately communicate with the
modifying court. The proceeding for enforcement continues unless the enforcing
court, after consultation with the modifying court, stays or dismisses the
proceeding.
§ 63-15-364. Enforcement
petition.
(A)
A petition under
this subarticle must be verified. Certified copies of all orders sought to be
enforced and of any order confirming registration must be attached to the
petition. A copy of a certified copy of an order may be attached instead of the
original.
(B)
A petition for enforcement of a child
custody determination must state:
(1)
whether the court
that issued the determination identified the jurisdictional basis it relied upon
in exercising jurisdiction and, if so, what the basis was;
(2)
whether the
determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or
modified by a court whose decision must be enforced under this article and, if
so, identify the court, the case number, and the nature of the proceeding;
(3)
whether any
proceeding has been commenced that could affect the current proceeding,
including proceedings relating to domestic violence, protective orders,
termination of parental rights, and adoptions and, if so, identify the court,
the case number, and the nature of the proceeding;
(4)
the present
physical address of the child and the respondent, if known;
(5)
whether relief in
addition to the immediate physical custody of the child and attorney’s fees is
sought, including a request for assistance from law enforcement officials and,
if so, the relief sought; and
(6)
if the child
custody determination has been registered and confirmed under
Section 63-15-358,
the date and place of registration.
(C)
Upon the filing of a petition, the
court shall issue an order directing the respondent to appear in person with or
without the child at a hearing and may enter any order necessary to ensure the
safety of the parties and the child. The hearing must be held on the next
judicial day after service of the order unless that date is impossible. In that
event, the court shall hold the hearing on the first judicial day possible. The
court may extend the date of hearing at the request of the petitioner.
(D)
An order issued under subsection (C)
must state the time and place of the hearing and advise the respondent that at
the hearing the court will order that the petitioner may take immediate physical
custody of the child and the payment of fees, costs, and expenses under
Section 63-15-372,
and may schedule a hearing to determine whether further relief is appropriate,
unless the respondent appears and establishes that:
(1)
the child custody
determination has not been registered and confirmed under
Section 63-15-358
and that:
(a)
the issuing court
did not have jurisdiction under Subarticle 2;
(b)
the child custody
determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or
modified by a court having jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2;
(c)
the respondent was
entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of
Section 63-15-314,
in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which enforcement
is sought; or
(2)
the child custody
determination for which enforcement is sought was registered and confirmed under
Section 63-15-356,
but has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having
jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2.
§
63-15-366. Service of petition and order.
Except as otherwise
provided in
Section 63-15-370, the petition and order must be served,
by any method authorized by the law of this State, upon respondent and any
person who has physical custody of the child.
§ 63-15-368. Physical
custody of child.
(A)
Unless the court
issues a temporary emergency order pursuant to
Section 63-15-336,
upon a finding that a petitioner is entitled to immediate physical custody of
the child, the court shall order that the petitioner may take immediate physical
custody of the child unless the respondent establishes that:
(1)
the child custody
determination has not been registered and confirmed under
Section 63-15-358
and that:
(a)
the issuing court
did not have jurisdiction under Subarticle 2;
(b)
the child custody
determination for which enforcement is sought has been vacated, stayed, or
modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2;
or
(c)
the respondent was
entitled to notice, but notice was not given in accordance with the standards of
Section 63-15-314,
in the proceedings before the court that issued the order for which enforcement
is sought; or
(2)
the child custody
determination for which enforcement is sought was registered and confirmed under
Section 63-15-358
but has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having
jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2.
(B)
The court shall award the fees,
costs, and expenses authorized under
Section 63-15-372
and may grant additional relief, including a request for the assistance of law
enforcement officials, and set a further hearing to determine whether additional
relief is appropriate.
(C)
If a party called to testify refuses
to answer on the ground that the testimony may be self-incriminating, the court
may draw an adverse inference from the refusal.
(D)
A privilege against disclosure of
communications between spouses and a defense of immunity based on the
relationship of husband and wife or parent and child may not be invoked in a
proceeding under this article.
§ 63-15-370. Warrant to
take physical custody.
(A)
Upon the filing of
a petition seeking enforcement of a child custody determination, the petitioner
may file a verified application for the issuance of a warrant to take physical
custody of the child if the child is immediately likely to suffer serious
physical harm or be removed from this State.
(B)
If the court, upon the testimony of
the petitioner or other witness, finds that the child is imminently likely to
suffer serious physical harm or be removed from this State, it may issue a
warrant to take physical custody of the child. The petition must be heard on the
next judicial day after the warrant is executed unless that date is impossible.
In that event, the court shall hold the hearing on the first judicial day
possible. The application for the warrant must include the statements required
by
Section 63-15-364(B).
(C)
A warrant to take physical custody of
a child must:
(1)
recite the facts
upon which a conclusion of imminent serious physical harm or removal from the
jurisdiction is based;
(2)
direct law
enforcement officers to take physical custody of the child immediately; and
(3)
provide for the
placement of the child pending final relief.
(D)
The respondent must be served with
the petition, warrant, and order immediately after the child is taken into
physical custody.
(E)
A warrant to take physical custody of
a child is enforceable throughout this State. If the court finds on the basis of
the testimony of the petitioner or other witness that a less intrusive remedy is
not effective, it may authorize law enforcement officers to enter private
property to take physical custody of the child. If required by exigent
circumstances of the case, the court may authorize law enforcement officers to
make a forcible entry at any hour.
(F)
The court may impose conditions upon
placement of a child to ensure the appearance of the child and the child’s
custodian.
§ 63-15-372. Costs.
(A)
The court shall
award the prevailing party, including a state, necessary and reasonable expenses
incurred by or on behalf of the party, including costs, communication expenses,
attorney’s fees, investigative fees, expenses for witnesses, travel expenses,
and childcare during the course of the proceedings, unless the party from whom
fees or expenses are sought establishes that the award would be clearly
inappropriate.
(B)
The court may not assess fees, costs,
or expenses against a state unless authorized by law other than this article.
§
63-15-374. Full faith and credit.
A court of this
State shall accord full faith and credit to an order issued by another state and
consistent with this article which enforces a child custody determination by a
court of another state unless the order has been vacated, stayed, or modified by
a court having jurisdiction to do so under Subarticle 2.
§
63-15-376. Appeals.
An appeal may be
taken from a final order in a proceeding under this subarticle in accordance
with expedited appellate procedures in other civil cases. Unless the court
enters a temporary emergency order under
Section 63-15-336, the enforcing court may not stay an
order enforcing a child custody determination pending appeal.
§ 63-15-378. Remedies.
(A)
In a case arising
under this article or involving the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction, the prosecutor may take any lawful action,
including resorting to a proceeding under this subarticle or any other available
civil proceeding to locate a child, obtain the return of a child, or enforce a
child custody determination if there is:
(1)
an existing child
custody determination;
(2)
a request to do so
from a court in a pending child custody proceeding;
(3)
a reasonable belief
that a criminal statute has been violated; or
(4)
a reasonable belief
that the child has been wrongfully removed or retained in violation of the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
(B)
A prosecutor acting under this
section acts on behalf of the court and may not represent any party.
§
63-15-380. Assistance of law enforcement.
At the request of a
prosecutor acting under
Section 63-15-378, a law enforcement officer may take any
lawful action reasonably necessary to locate a child or a party and assist a
prosecutor with responsibilities under
Section 63-15-378.
§
63-15-382. Assessment of assistance costs.
If the respondent
is not the prevailing party, the court may assess against the respondent all
direct expenses and costs incurred by the prosecutor and law enforcement
officers under
Section 63-15-378 or
63-15-380.
§
63-15-390. Uniformity of application.
In applying and
construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote
uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact
it.
§
63-15-392. Severability.
If any provision of
this article or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid,
the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this article
which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to
this end the provisions of this article are severable.
§
63-15-394. Applicability to prior proceedings.
A motion or other
request for relief made in a child custody proceeding or to enforce a child
custody determination which was commenced before the effective date of this act
is governed by the law in effect at the time the motion or other request was
made.

|